B. Rael Cahn, Arnaud Delorme, John Polich · 2013
Temporal Coordination
# Continue PAPER_TPL
BIO
Meditation increased theta (4–8 Hz) phase-locking to standard stimuli (100–400 ms), approaching the level seen during active task engagement.
"Standard stimuli also evinced significantly greater theta inter-trial coherence during meditation compared with control state."
Standard stimulus-related processing, p. 104
Enhanced theta phase-locking to repeated standards during meditation indicates stronger temporal coordination of sensory processing, a candidate mechanism for binding/segmentation in conscious access .
"For the theta phase synchrony (100–400 ms) measure to standards, a significant state effect was obtained... the passive control state was associated with significantly less theta synchrony to standards compared with active task activity (P < 0.005), but the passive meditation state was not significantly different from active task theta synchrony (P = 0.42)."
Meditation state and active task activity, p. 106
Theta synchrony during meditation matched active-task levels, suggesting meditation recruits timing mechanisms that support conscious processing without overt task demands .
"Data reflecting event-related spectral perturbation and inter-trial coherence (phase locking) were derived from delta (2–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha-1 (8–10 Hz) and alpha-2 (10–12 Hz)... The inter-trial coherence and spectral power calculations were obtained using the complex Gaussian wavelet."
Methods, p. 102
Inter-trial coherence provides a quantitative measure of temporal coordination (phase-locking) across trials, operationalizing oscillatory timing mechanisms relevant to conscious processing .
Figures
Fig. 3 (p. 106)
: Shows enhanced theta phase-locking, including during meditation, linking oscillatory timing to altered processing states relevant for conscious access .
Limitations: EEG has limited spatial specificity; sample size is modest; effects are correlational (no causal manipulation); comparisons include both passive and active states which may introduce task/state confounds.
Selective Routing
# Continue PAPER_TPL
BIO
During meditation, distracter-related early delta (2–4 Hz, ~100–500 ms) recruitment decreased while late alpha (8–10 Hz, 500–900 ms) desynchronization increased, indicating altered gating of distracter processing.
"The present findings describe further the neuroelectric brain state produced by this meditation practice... and the results imply that such practice involves enhancement in early stimulus-representation... Also found was decreased frontal responsivity to distracting stimuli accompanied by a dissociation between the normal positive relationship between early enhanced P3/evoked delta and later event-related desynchronization of alpha power."
DISCUSSION, p. 107
Authors interpret decreased frontal/delta responses with increased later alpha ERD to distracters as altered top-down gating, consistent with selective routing mechanisms for attentional control in conscious processing .
"For the late 500–900 ms alpha-1 power from distracter processing, a state effect was obtained... active task late alpha-1 power decreases to distracter stimuli were significantly greater than the control state (P < 0.05) but indistinguishable from the meditation state (P = 0.97)."
Meditation state and active task activity, p. 107
Late alpha ERD to distracters in meditation mirrors active-task engagement, indicating selective routing that maintains processing while reducing early frontal reactivity .
"The attention-related recruitment of 2–4 Hz power to distracters was decreased in meditation... This was complemented by the late event-related alpha desynchronization to the distracters that was actually increased in meditation."
CONCLUSIONS, p. 109
Summary emphasizes reduced early delta with increased late alpha ERD for distracters during meditation, a pattern indicative of altered gating/selection in the processing pipeline .
Figures
Fig. 5 (p. 107)
: Demonstrates larger late alpha desynchronization to distracters in meditation/active vs control, consistent with later-stage selective processing .
Fig. 2 (p. 104)
: Visualizes early delta dynamics to distracters across states, supporting claims about reduced early frontal delta recruitment during meditation .
Limitations: The delta effect to distracters shows only trend-level differences when including an active comparator; EEG inferences about 'frontal' engagement are indirect; no direct causal manipulation of attentional circuits.
Information Integration
# Continue PAPER_TPL
BIO
Meditation modulated early gamma-band (35–45 Hz, 20–100 ms) phase synchrony and power to distracters, especially in long-term practitioners, consistent with binding/integration via synchrony.
"The statistical analysis of the 35–45 Hz phase synchrony data across stimulus types yielded significant outcomes for both control [F(2,30)=24.0, P < 0.00001] and meditation [F(2,30)=25.5, P < 0.00001] states... The 35–45 Hz post-stimulus power across stimulus types was not significant for control... but it was significant for meditation state [F(2,30)=5.3, P < 0.01]."
Standard stimulus-related processing / Individual differences, p. 105
Significant gamma-band phase synchrony and state-dependent power modulation during meditation point to enhanced integration by synchrony mechanisms linked to conscious representation .
"For the longer term practitioners, meditation state yielded higher gamma phase synchrony values during meditation at frontal (P < 0.05), but not central or parietal sites (P > 0.97, all comparisons)."
Individual differences, p. 105
Expertise-dependent increases in gamma synchrony during meditation suggest strengthened large-scale binding/integration, a proposed substrate for unified conscious contents .
Figures
Fig. 6 (p. 107)
: Displays gamma synchrony and power patterns across states and stimuli; meditation emphasizes stimulus-differential gamma, consistent with integrative binding by synchrony .
Limitations: Gamma-band findings are correlational and may be influenced by expertise and state factors; EEG gamma can be susceptible to muscle artifacts despite ICA; no direct measure of long-range connectivity.