Causal Control
# Continue PAPER_TPL
BIO
Sham-controlled TPS to frontoparietal and precuneus targets increased memory-task activation and attention-network connectivity, with cognitive benefits in younger patients.
"Participants received 6 TPS applications over 2 weeks per cycle (6 verum plus 6 sham TPS applications in total), using a modified Duolith SD1 (Storz Medical AG). ... Brain stimulation targets comprised bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and inferior frontal cortex, bilateral lateral parietal cortex extending to the Wernicke area, and precuneus cortex (eFigure 2 in Supplement 2)."
Procedures, p. 2
This describes the causal intervention (TPS) and targeted frontoparietal/precuneus sites used to modulate cognitive networks, enabling tests of causal control over brain activity and behavior relevant to consciousness studies in humans .
"Comparing the conditions with respect to changes in memory-associated brain activation from baseline (interaction condition × session), significantly higher posttreatment activation was observed in the verum condition in the precuneus, a key area of the memory network, visual areas, and in frontal regions supporting executive functions (superior and inferior frontal gyrus) (Figure 3). ... No area showed higher activation in the sham compared with the verum condition."
fMRI Outcomes, p. 7
Relative to sham, the intervention increased activation in memory and executive hubs, demonstrating that externally applied stimulation can causally upregulate network activity associated with conscious cognitive processing .
Figures
Figure 3 (p. 8)
: Shows causal TPS-induced increases in task-evoked activation across memory and executive regions, supporting causal control over conscious task processing .
Figure 2 (p. 7)
: Behavioral improvements after TPS (vs sham), especially in younger patients, link the causal intervention to enhanced cognitive function relevant for conscious performance .
Tables
Table (p. 6)
: Table. Neuropsychological Outcomes at Each Time Point in Intention-to-Treat Analysis
Limitations: Task-evoked fMRI result notes uncorrected thresholding (P = .001, uncorrected); cognitive benefits were age-dependent and primary ITT interaction was nonsignificant, with potential carryover effects.